Missouri

SUBROGATION VS. ASSIGNMENT IN MISSOURI: When Can You Subrogate Property Damage?

We are all aware that Missouri’s prohibition against assignment of a cause of action for personal injuries has complicated subrogation in that state. Subrogation in personal injury cases is considered to be against public policy because it amounts to an impermissible assignment of the insured’s right to a cause of action for suffering a personal…

Lee R. Wickert

MWL Announces Lee Wickert As New Partner!

Matthiesen, Wickert & Lehrer, S.C. is pleased to announce that Lee R. Wickert has become a partner with the firm. Lee is in his 6th year of practice but he is no stranger to the firm having worked for MWL since 2009, including three years as a research law clerk. Lee attended the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and obtained his law degree…

Words

Words Matter: The Importance of Clarity in Subrogation and Mediation Agreements

Pulitzer prize winning historian David McCullough once said that “Writing is thinking. To write well is to think clearly. That’s why it is so hard.” When claims adjusters, subrogation professionals, and/or subrogation lawyers document a settlement or stipulation with an insured’s or employee’s attorney regarding a subrogation interest, getting all the right words in the…

Delaware

DELAWARE SUPREME COURT REVERSES ITSELF: Allows Workers’ Compensation Subrogation of UIM Benefits

The ability of a workers’ compensation carrier to subrogate against and/or seek reimbursement from a recovery made from a third-party tortfeasor responsible for causing the employee’s work-related injuries is universally recognized across the country as a major tool for holding down workers’ compensation premiums for large and small businesses and employers. Whether or not this…

Dram Shop

ARIZONA SUPREME COURT ELIMINATES COMMON LAW DRAM SHOP ACTIONS: Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., 2023 WL 6801025 (Ariz. 2023)

On October 16, 2023, the Arizona Supreme Court in Torres v. JAI Dining Services (Phoenix), Inc., ruled that the Arizona constitution does not protect common law dram shop actions, and thus, the legislature, by enacting a statutory dram shop claim, eliminated the then-existing common law dram shop cause of action.[1] This means that in order…